Blogs at Amazon

« March 1 Weekly Open Thread | Main | March 8 Weekly Open Thread - Suspic »

1953-54 Studebaker "Loewy Coupes"

Whenever one of the buff books runs a "most beautiful cars of all time" feature, or someone puts out a big honkin' coffee-table book on the subject, the car we will be looking at today usually makes the list, alongside such lovelies as prewar Talbots and Bugattis, boat-tail Auburns and Cord 810s, curvaceous Italian sports cars, E-type Jaguars and 1961 Lincoln Continentals. We could debate which of them is the absolute loveliest all day and into the night and halfway through tomorrow's breakfast and never settle the question, but I would submit that today's subject stands out from the rest of this elite category in one respect.

A prewar Bugatti or a Cord looks like something from the 1930s--beautiful, yes, but clearly a creation of a particular era. Likewise, the Ferraris and Maseratis on the list, they all have that late-60s-early-70s groovy-mod jet-set thing going on. The E-type is clearly a product of the late 50s and early 60s, while the Continental's styling practically screams "Kennedy administration!"

In contract to these, today's subject isn't quite so obviously tied to a particular year. It was designed as a show car and was clearly "ahead of the curve" when it rolled out nearly 60 years ago--and if it's not quite "ahead of the curve" today, that's only because the "curve" may have finally caught up with it. Take out the triangular vent windows, dial back on the chrome, give it headrests, three-point seatbelts, cupholders, and power remote mirrors, slap on a Honda or Toyota badge, and you could plausibly pass it off as a 2010 model.

Ladies and gentlemen, fellow Car Lusters of all ages, I give you the stunningly beautiful Studebaker "Loewy Coupes," the 1953-54 Starlight and Starliner:

The "Loewy coupe" nickname is, obviously, a reference to Raymond Loewy, whose studio did much of Studebaker's styling and designed everything else from soft drink bottles to locomotives to the paint scheme for Air Force One. While the Loewy coupes were indeed a product of the Loewy & Associates design studio, they weren't styled by Mr. Loewy himself. By the time the talented Mr. Loewy reached his greatest fame in the middle years of last century he was not really a designer anymore, he was mainly a promoter of the designs done by his staff--even though contemporary press coverage and advertising usually gave him all the credit.

Loewy's relationship with Studebaker began in the late 1930s, with the design of the 1939 Champion. The actual designing was done by Virgil M. Exner, Sr., who was then an employee of Loewy & Associates. This design remained in production into the abbreviated 1942 model year. When civilian auto production resumed after the war, Studebaker, like all the other established manufacturers, dusted off the stored tooling for the '42s and put them back in production as 1946 models.

For 1947, Studebaker rolled out an all-new "envelope body" design. The rear quarters had shallow bulges that suggested fenders, and the hood had a "postwar nose" that recalled the prewar narrow hood, but as you can see from the ad on the right, we've definitely gotten away from prewar styling. Studebaker's advertising proudly proclaimed that it was "First by far with a postwar car!" ("Dutch" Darrin, the stylist who did the 1947 Kaisers and Frazers, might argue that he got there ahead of Studebaker, but the boys from South Bend had still beaten all of the other manufacturers by a year or more in the race to introduce flashy new postwar styling.) Though the design was attributed to Loewy, it was once more Virgil Exner (now employed in-house at South Bend after a falling-out with Loewy) who had done the actual work--he's listed as the inventor on the design patent!

The '47 Stude body stayed in production until 1952. The "front clip"--the outer body forward of the cowl--was restyled twice over the course of production. The 1950 revision by Robert Bourke, the chief designer at Loewy & Associates, gave the world the iconic "bullet nose" made famous as Fozzie Bear's ride in The Muppet Movie. Bullet-nosed Studes are certainly a worthy subject for Car Lust, but for purposes of the present discussion, the 1952 version is more significant.

The '52 restyling produced a more conventional-looking "postwar nose" atop a chrome grille, with the headlights in chrome bezels on either side. The lines of the "nose" carried down the front of the car in a V-shape that split the grille in two. The upper molding on the grille flowed up from the "nose" in a slight curve, reminiscent of the bow wave kicked up by a ship under way. 1952 also saw the introduction of a hardtop version of the body design with a wraparound rear window, the "Starliner," which proved a strong seller.

After the 1952 Studes were finished, Bob Bourke sketched out a design for a new "Starliner" show car. It would not be an understatement to call that Mr. Bourke's best day at the office ever, because this car was absolutely drop-dead gorgeous.

Bourke's show car design had a family resemblance to the '52 Starliner: the nose, headlights, bow-wave grille openings, and the little cabin air vent hatch behind the front wheel were all still there. The proportions were radically different, though. The show car was longer, with a longer wheelbase  (120.5" versus the 115" frame used on the '52), and lower--dramatically lower. The overall height was 56 inches, a good six inches to a foot less than everything else on the American roads that wasn't a British two-seater. Not only was it low, it was sleek, its smooth lines and sloped hood in sharp contrast to the generally squared-up and flat-faced look then in vogue. At a time when American styling was trending toward more and more chrome, it had restrained ornamentation, so that it managed to be both dramatic and understated at the same time.

Most important, everything on the car was just the right size and shape relative to everything else. It all fit together. It worked in a way that few designs ever do.

Studebaker management loved the design. Absolutely loved it. They loved it so much they decided to put it into production as a 1953 model, pretty much exactly as Bob Bourke had sketched it. They also decided to restyle the company's sedans to match the coupe.

It was at this point that Studebaker ran into a few problems, and made a few costly mistakes. The coupe was engineered with a very light frame. The prototype fit together perfectly--until they installed an engine. The weight of the engine block flexed the frame enough that the front end no longer lined up correctly. This was eventually corrected, but production was delayed by several weeks, and even after the fix the new Starliner was a little too flexible for its own good, with a tendency to develop squeaks and rattles. In response to this, Studebaker developed a variation on the design called the "Starlight," which had a pillar behind the door and a fixed rear quarter window. The B-pillar compromised the purity of the design a bit, but stiffened the car body and cut down on the squeaks and rattles.

The sedans were another story entirely. The base sedans were built on a 116.5" frame, four inches shorter than the Starliner and Starlight. They were given a slightly higher roofline, which combined with the short wheelbase to cause them to look stubby compared to the coupes. The thickish window frames on the doors also made the whole greenhouse a little too heavy. Still, they're not bad looking cars by any means.

 

Studebaker's model lineup included a stretched sedan called the Land Cruiser. The '53 Land Cruiser used the coupe's 120.5" wheelbase, and as you can see from the photo below, the extra four inches gave it better proportions.

 

The 1953 Studes made their debut to rave reviews for their styling. The ads called them "The new American car with the European look." Some contemporary European cars--mostly Italian sports cars and the like--were low and clean-lined like the Studebakers, but most were no less tall and square than their Yankee counterparts, and quite a few were still holding on to prewar styling themes like separate fenders and narrow hoods. The "European look" Starlight and Starliner were as far ahead of most of Europe as they were of their Detroit competition.

1953 Studebaker magazine ad The Loewy coupes came in two different "models" and two different trim levels. The Champion model series was powered by an 85 gross horsepower flathead straight six originally developed before the war. Champion Starlights, with the B-pillar, were available in "Deluxe" (middle) and "Regal" (top-of-the-line) trim levels; the pillarless Starliner was only available in Regal trim.

The more-expensive Commander model series was powered by Studebaker's overhead-valve V-8 introduced in 1951, the first modern V-8 developed by one of the "independent" car makers. In its 1953 version, this engine had a displacement of 232.6 cubic inches and produced 120 gross horsepower. It served Studebaker well--apart from a tendency toward minor oil leaks, it had no real vices, and it underwent steady improvements over the next decade, culminating in the supercharged R2 and R3 Avanti engines of 1963. As with the Champion series, you could get a Commander Starlight in either Deluxe or Regal trim, or go whole hog and splurge on a top-of-the-list Commander Regal Starliner. The only outward distinction between a Champion and a Commander is the badging on the hood and rear quarters--Champions have a stylized "S", while Commanders have a "V-8" device. The two models also had completely different dashboards.

Once they hit the showrooms, the coupes outsold the sedans nearly four to one, creating yet another problem for Studebaker. In setting its production schedules for the new model year, Studebaker had quite understandably assumed that the roomier and more practical sedans would outsell the racy coupes, as they had in 1952, and 1951, and, well, pretty much every year since the end of the war. The initial shortage of coupes, the production delays resulting from the stiffness issues with the Starlight, and the need to rejigger production schedules to match demand, undoubtedly cost the company some canceled orders and lost sales. The coupes also suffered from build quality problems, according to contemporary reviews. Still, Studebaker sold nearly 70,000 Loewy coupes (slightly less than half its total sales) in the 1953 model year.

It did not take long for those interested in high performance to take notice of the Loewy coupes. The Starlight and Starliner had light weight (from just under 2,700 pounds for a Champion Deluxe Starlight to a little over 3,100 for a Commander Regal Starliner), and a lower center of gravity and better aerodynamics than other cars. Actually, they're less aerodynamic than you might expect, with a drag coefficient of 0.40--the windshield is rather vertical, and the tail is too low--but given that nearly everything else available at the time was shaped like a streamlined brick with bumpers, the Loewys became the car of choice for stock-bodied salt flat speedsters and such.

For less extreme sporting use, Bill Frick, a car customizer on Long Island, offered the Studillac. This was a Starliner with the stock drivetrain replaced by a Cadillac V-8. The circa 1953 Caddy V-8 was a 331-cubic inch small-block producing 210 gross horsepower and 330 foot-pounds of torque in stock form, designed to overcome the inertia of five thousand pound dreadnought road barges. Drop that engine into a car that was about a ton lighter, and the result was an absolute screaming terror--around 8.5 seconds 0-60, at a time when 15 seconds would have been considered impressive. The price of a Studillac conversion was impressive, too--$1,500 ($11,500 in today's money) plus the cost of the donor Starliner (at least $2,115 back then, equivalent to $16,850 now). Mr. Frick built just under 300 "factory" Studillacs between 1953 and 1955, and many more Caddy engine swaps were performed by individual owners following along with the many "how to" articles in car magazines.

For 1954, the Starliner frame was stiffened, and the grille inserts were given an egg-crate treatment. The build quality issues had been solved, so one would have expected the Loewy coupes to continue selling strong. However, despite heavy promotion including TV ads, Studebaker's total sales for 1954 were only 68,708 vehicles--less than half of the previous year's figure.

Some have suggested that the problem was that Bob Bourke's design was too radical, too artistic, too pretty for the unsophisticated rubes in flyover country to appreciate. This theory appeals to a certain snobbish highbrow mentality, but it's not correct. The real problem was that 1954 was a really bad year to be an independent car manufacturer. Ford was engaged in a price war with GM at the low end of the market. Both manufacturers cut the price of Fords and Chevys and flooded dealerships with discounted iron, and the independents like Studebaker couldn't keep up. For example, the factory price of a bare-bones base-model 2-door Champion (6-cylinder) sedan was $1,758, which is $13,928 in today's dollars. That was a bit more than the factory price of a base-model Ford 2-door sedan with a bigger V-8 ($1,728, or $13,690 today) and significantly more than an equivalent base-model 6-cylinder Chevy 2-door sedan ($1,623, or $12,858 today)--and the real-world price differential was even worse because the Fords and Chevys were being sold at a discount from the factory price. 

Studebaker didn't have the volume or economies of scale or the financial strength to match that kind of pricing. The story was the same at Hudson, Nash, Kaiser, and Packard, all of whom took a major hit that year. Even Chrysler suffered from the price war--Plymouth sales fell by around 20% from 1953. The bad year forced faltering Hudson to merge with Nash, drove a desperate Packard to acquire Studebaker, and convinced Kaiser to give up on the US market completely and retreat to South America.

Blogger "Grease Girl" and her 1955 Champion - click the photo to visit her website. For 1955, the entire Studebaker lineup received a different front end. The "bow wave" split grille was replaced by a single wide grille opening surrounded by a large chrome band. The '55 models included a new top-of-the-line President Speedster, a "halo car" with a higher-output V-8 and a unique yellow and green "lemon-lime" paint job. Sales rebounded to healthier levels, though I'm not sure the restyling is the main reason why. The '55s certainly have their fans, especially the Speedsters, but to me the chrome-happy front end isn't nearly as attractive as Bob Bourke's more restrained original. I've seen photos of customized '55s where the nose piece has been painted body color, and I think it looks a little better that way.

In 1956, Studebaker's styling took a turn in a much more conventional direction. The sedans were given a flat-faced front clip that could have come off a "shoebox" Chevy, while the coupes got a new "radiator" grille and became the Hawk series. The Hawks stayed in production until the 1964 model year. While still recognizably a derivative of Bob Bourke's original design, the Hawks have a very different personality, and are a topic for another day.

The first time I saw a Loewy coupe, I was 12 years old and looking at the model kits in my favorite hobby shop. There it was, on the box of an AMT kit. Sleek, clean, understated, futuristic--1953? That can't be right, it looks too modern for 1953! I bought the kit, but I also decided, then and there, that I wanted one in 12-inches-to-the-foot scale someday.

Four years later, I was driving on a country road out near Berlin Lake and I saw two '53 Studes, parked in front of some fellow's barn. They were weathered and clearly hadn't moved in a long time, but they appeared intact. I stopped and chatted up the man of the house and found out they were for sale if I was interested and had the coin.

My parents talked me out of it. They were only doing their job, looking out for my best interests, so I can't get upset about it. A full frame-off restoration was well beyond the capabilities of a mechanically inexperienced 16-year old kid. The effort probably only would have frustrated me and ruined the car.

I still want one, though. They're not common by any means, and prices for restored Loewy coupes are, well, kinda pricey. When you do see one, as often as not it's been given the hot-rod treatment--dropped suspension, modern rims, "frenching" the headlights and taillights to eliminate the chrome bezels, and so forth. I'm of two minds about such things. On the one hand, I'd rather see Bob Bourke's masterpiece preserved in uncompromised showroom stock condition; on the other hand, it's better to have a Lowey coupe be hot-rodded and survive than to let it be melted down to make Dodge Calibers.

Of course, there's also the occasional restomod/hotrod that comes out, well, if not necessarily better than the original, as least as a worthy tribute:

 

I think Bob Bourke would have approved of that one; don't you?

--Cookie the Dog's Owner

The print ads came from John's Old Car & Truck Pictures; the '52 Starliner from How Stuff Works; the white over red Champion sedan (with right-hand drive!) came from Flickr user "53Stude"; the red over white Starlight is by Flickr user "Brain Toad"; the drop-top restomod was photographed by Flickr user "bballchico"; the photo of blogger "Grease Girl" and her '55 Champion came from her website; the others are from the impressive collection of Stude photos at Bill Jackameit's Studebaker Stuff site.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e54ed05fc28833012877abdde5970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 1953-54 Studebaker "Loewy Coupes":

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Great post on an absolutely stunning car. The Starliner has always been one of my absolute favorite American post-war cars. In fact, before the Internet made such knowledge easily accessible and referenced, my Dad and I always debated whether these Loewy cars were called Starliners or Hawks. It's good to know that they're both in the same family.

I will take issue with this line, though:
"Take out the triangular vent windows, dial back on the chrome, give it headrests, three-point seatbelts, cupholders, and power remote mirrors, slap on a Honda or Toyota badge, and you could plausibly pass it off as a 2010 model."

I think that's selling the Starliner a bit short; there's no modern car that could compete with the Starliner's slim and trim lines. Today's cars are habitually bloated in a way that the Starliner isn't.

Chris: "Today's cars are habitually bloated in a way that the Starliner isn't."

Not only that, they are also bland. Japan's "Pseudo-luxury" brands (Infinity, Lexus, and older Acuras) don't look upscale enough from their lower-scale company offerings to justify much price difference at all. Change the nameplates before introductions, and I doubt anybody would notice a Toyota from a Lexus, a Nissan from an Infinity, etc.

Great post, Cookie.

Studebaker's '53-'54 coupes were the first car I ever noticed as being something more than just another car (that moment came about 1959 or so, I was about three years of age). Another thing that set the Starliners and Starlights apart from the Auburns, Cords and Jaguars is that an ordinary person could afford one.

Loewy was known (or maybe not - I'm an industrial designer, and this is part of the lore) for always positioning himself at the right side of any group with whom he was being photographed.

That way, his name would be listed first in the caption.

es

A friend of mine had a '53 Chevrolet as a costly learning experience. The idea that it was from the same year as this is pretty astounding. When you look at the drag coefficient of the Studebaker, keep in mind that details are important in addition to general shape. It this car achieved a drag coefficient of .40 without the benefit of any flush glass, flush headlights, flush rain gutters, faired mirrors, flush ornamentation, etc..., it must have been a pretty clean overall shape. Just a wild guess based on following auto development since the mid '70s, I'd say that this car could achieve a drag coefficient under .35 with modern detail application. Probably even with what was known in the '80s.

Thanks for this. I'm generally '50s-challenged regarding cars, and especially so from the minor manufacturers. Seems similar to the Continental Mark II in that it sticks out like a sore (but attractive) thumb from everything else being made in the US at the time.

A classic...and long lived too. The coupe's basic structure lasted until the end of GT production in late 1963, when Stuidebaker closed its South Bend facility.

When you consider Studebaker was the first major producer to come out with a postwar design (1947), the classic/iconic/weird (take your pick) 50-51 Bulletnoses, these coupes (and hardtops), the Lark compact, and the Avanti...Studebaker doesn't get enough credit from car fans or the public. You's be surprised at how many "car guys" make stupid comments aboutthe make at car shows.

This is the best car.

And by the way, just for the original Stude Coupe and the Avanti, there should be some kind of annual national holiday celebrating Studebaker.

A

I purchased a 1953 2 DR sedan from the orginal owner in 1988...repainted it the original color and had the seats re-done (as close to original as possible)...and drove it as a weekend driver for 15 years with very little effort or repairs. One tough car. It was a lot of fun....especially the reactions of other people...almost no one guessed it was from 1953....they thought it was too sleek and low for that era...even the sedan. I finally had to sell it off as I moved....but I loved that little car.

In addition to all of the accomplishments listed above, Raymond Loewy also designed the superstructure and grille of International Harvester's "letter series" Farmall tractors, produced from 1939-1954. These models are antique-tractor-show favorites and still look stylish to-day.

As one of the prouds owner of the 1966 GTO when I was 20 years old, and later a 1966 Corvette, the stigma of these Studebakers will never be replicated.

When I was in high school, my best friend was killed in one when the accelerator stuck. He landed in his parents front yard at 2 in the morning - many memories, both fond and tragic.

I was very nearly born in the back seat of a '53. My dad made it to the hospital with mere minutes to spare. He loved that little red car.

My uncle was a 'Stude guy' and in 1953 he bought a Champion Starliner painted the same light green as the V8 model shown above. I was only 8 and at my Grandmother's the fine summer day he brought it out to show her. As young as I was I could see it was a special car. It's a day and a memory that's stuck with me all these years. My uncle was a gentleman and had a good sense of style.

He'd trade every 3 or 4 years. I think a Hawk followed the coupe and then there was a President. Finally in 1965 he deserted for the Ford camp and bought a Galaxie 500 hardtop. Studebaker, having descended into the Lark years, offered nothing to match his sense of style. Still. the Ford was a nice looking car, but not in the same league as that '53 coupe.

This is a post pretty close to home, as my dad owns a 55 Speedster President. Just a few things that I know, but I am not nearly an expert; the President model was more than just an engine. It included leather seating, an engine turned aluminum dash, and a lot more stainless and chrome trim. Also, they came in all sorts of colors. My dad's example has a color combo like this:

http://dmccraryart.com/images/presidents%20speedster.jpg

I need to write a post about it, it took 1st in it's class at the Milwaukee Masterpiece last year, and it's a pretty amazing looking car.

Res: You're an industrial designer? Where at? Check out my website and get in contact with me: www.gruvdesign.net

Ah... A bear in his natural habitat.

Having owned a '53 Commander Starlight Coupe for the past thirty-three years, I appreciate your comments, and all that followed. It is truly a joy to drive.

"Take out the triangular vent windows, dial back on the chrome, give it headrests, three-point seatbelts, cupholders, and power remote mirrors, slap on a Honda or Toyota badge, and you could plausibly pass it off as a 2010 model"

Yeah, um...I personally see that as kind of an insult to Studebaker. I could see a bulletnose compared with the Subie Tribeca, but the sleek "Loewy" coupes are mounds better in the looks department than either of those manufacturers.

Anyway, moving on, these cars were also aerodynamic - they're favorites in the unlimited classes in the Carrera Panamericana.

I met Gene Requa, a designer for Studebaker, about 2 years ago in Pacific Beach. He gave me his address in Del Mar and invited me to come by for ping pong and beer. Sadly, I moved shortly afterward and lost his contact information. In trying to find him, I learned that he died at the age of 94. In my brief meeting with him, I learned that he was a brilliant man with strong opinions. I met him because he was driving an extremely cool 1964 Studebaker Lark that he had used red tape on to define the full width tail light that he had meant for it to have. It will go down as one of my regrets that I didn't get to see him again and discuss the history of the car company he'd worked for at greater length. I do recall that he seemed disappointed when I answered his question about what I drove by telling him I recently bought a Honda Civic Si sedan.

All you need to know about Studillacs can be found in Ian Flemings "Diamonds Are Forever". My name is Bond, James Bond.

Did you ever get one? If not do you want one? If so e-mail me. woodysrods@shaw.ca
Good Roads.
Brian

Had a neighbor and friend of the family that had a red w. white top 53 coupe--a duplicate of the one pictured in this article. Thing I best remember besides the overall styling was the fact it used toggle-switches viz dials,etc., on dash-board instrumentation as used in many fighter aircraft cockpits--was "cool" to a 9-yr old boy.

really neat model. back in my youth i had a '53 starlight coupe, a commander, "three on th tree" w/ od into which i stuffed a 331 caddy 090 over3/4 harmon& collins cam headman headers,and dual quads(wcfb carters i think, it was a long time ago) la sale three speed ect. in 1956 it was very impressive!in my old age, i'd rather a'54, commander STOCK thank you!

This is one (if not the prettest)cars ever made I am not a designer by any means but I feel in love with this car at the age of 8 or 9 years old My 3rd grade teacher had one and I would stop and look at it walk around it every morning It was so low I figured I would be able to drive it I don't remember much about cars before that. As years went buy and I got older I said I am going to own one of those when I am old enought to drive. My 1st. car was a 53 studebaker commander conv. Someone had cut the roof off and it bolted on and off. And I have had one ever since. Today I own a 54 champion coupe a 54 Bill Frick studillac and a 55 president coupe modified aal fiberglass 53 nose and putting a 86 grandnational turbo v6 eng. in it. I love these cars And wish I could have one in every color

I have a 1954 Starlight coupe and every car show I bring it to,it is a hit.I won best in show 4 times last summer here in Ontario,Canada.People just love it,it is so sleek an d beautiful.I put a 5 speed mated to a 289 Stude V8 in it and the car is a rocket ship!

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In.

Pictured above: This is a forlorn Chevy Vega photographed by reader Gary Sinar. (Share yours)

Powered by Rollyo

Car Lust™ Contributors

November 2014

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30